Freedom of teaching, terrorism and state restrictions: culture of suspected or legitimate defense of the state?

Authors

  • Edwin Figueroa Gutarra Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33539/lumen.2018.v14n1.1204

Keywords:

Democracy, material democracy, Rule of Law, Constitutional State, freedom of education, terrorism, state restrictions, culture of suspicion, legitimate defense of the State, monitoring, proportionality test.

Abstract

Based on an analysis between the notions of democracy and the constitutional state, this study addresses the complex relationships between the fundamental right to freedom of education and terrorism. It is an axis of all public policy to combat terrorism within the framework of the rule of law and in that purpose, the State implements state restrictions on non-readmission for teachers sentenced for terrorism. However, it is necessary to elucidate these questions as to whether they are expressions of a culture of suspicion, or whether in their case they are measures for a legitimate defense of the same State.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Edwin Figueroa Gutarra, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos

Doctor en Derecho por la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Magíster en Derecho del Trabajo por la Universidad San Martín de Porres, Abogado por la Universidad San Martín de Porres, Juez Superior titular del Distrito Judicial de Lambayeque, Catedrático en los cursos de Derecho Constitucional, Derecho Procesal Constitucional, Docente en la Maestría de las Universidades Nacionales de Trujillo, Piura y Pedro Ruiz Gallo de Lambayeque, Autor de libros de Derecho Constitucional.

Published

2018-06-30

How to Cite

Figueroa Gutarra, E. (2018). Freedom of teaching, terrorism and state restrictions: culture of suspected or legitimate defense of the state?. Lumen, (14 - I), 30–47. https://doi.org/10.33539/lumen.2018.v14n1.1204