Weighting of fundamental rights in time of pandemic

Authors

  • Aroldo Ramiro Aguirre Núñez Academia de la Magistratura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33539/lumen.2020.v16n1.2282

Keywords:

Pandemic, supreme decree, affectation, fundamental rights, suitability, necessity, weighting, proportionality, argumentation, law

Abstract

The appearance and installation in our country of the pandemic caused by the so-called covid-19, has led to the issuance of various supreme decrees, which in the name of protecting the health, the environment of the family and the community, have cut in a way Intensive certain fundamental rights of the first degree, such as freedom of transit and freedom of work. The normative argument used by the Executive Power is weak, since the preeminence of certain fundamental rights of the second degree over the other so-called fundamental rights of the first degree supposes a hypothetical scenario of imminent constitutional controversy in which the so-called weighting of fundamental rights, in which the principles of suitability, necessity and weighting or proportionality
itself will be debated, whose scenarios become very interesting and above all promising for the clarification of the conflict of rights. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Aroldo Ramiro Aguirre Núñez, Academia de la Magistratura

Magistrado del 6° Juzgado Penal Unipersonal de Lima Norte, Maestro en Derecho Penal, por la
UNFV, Docente Principal de la Academia de la Magistratura

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Aguirre Núñez, A. R. (2020). Weighting of fundamental rights in time of pandemic. Lumen, 16(1), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.33539/lumen.2020.v16n1.2282