The omission of the doll by the legislator in the assume of the fact of article 1233 ° of the Cvil Code

Authors

  • Piero Augusto Da Giau Roose Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33539/lumen.2018.v14n1.1207

Keywords:

obligations, benefits, creditor, debtor, payment, malice, blame, assumptions, securities, protest, enforcement order, damage, primitive obligation.

Abstract

The article 1233 of the Peruvian Civil Code from 1984 developed while the repealed “Securities Act No. 16587” was still in force and regulating only four securities: The bill of exchange, promissory note, check and voucher to order. At present, have been added to the first three mentioned, a large number of securities that incorporate rights of various kinds that can fit into a promise or a payment order, that generates the need to analyze in depth the scope of the regulation. Additionally, the article analyzed, influenced by foreign law, has not provided the intentional act of the creditor, limited only to blame and not malice. This allows us to affirm the existence of unregulated behaviors with no specific legal consequence. The above described generates the need to modify this regulation and link it deeply to the “Obligations Theory” and in the new “Securities Act No. 27287

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Piero Augusto Da Giau Roose, Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón

Maestro en Derecho Civil y Comercial por la Universidad de San Martín de Porres. Abogado por la misma casa de estudios. Docente en la UNIFE, Universidad ESAN, Escuela Militar de Chorrillos “Francisco Bolognesi”, Academia de la Magistratura, Universidad Nacional “José Faustino Sánchez Carrión”, Escuela Nacional de Control. Expositor en temas de Derecho Cambiario en el Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Lima. Autor de diversos libros de la Especialidad.

Published

2018-06-30

How to Cite

Da Giau Roose, P. A. (2018). The omission of the doll by the legislator in the assume of the fact of article 1233 ° of the Cvil Code. Lumen, (14 - I), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.33539/lumen.2018.v14n1.1207