Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading

Authors

  • Yuri Vega Mere Universidad Católica Santa María (Arequipa)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33539/lumen.2018.v14n2.1224

Keywords:

Food, cohabitants, duties, family, de facto couples

Abstract

In this article the author develops the regulation that corresponds to the "food" among the cohabitants and the inconsistencies reflected in our legal system. He argues that neither the constituent of 1979 nor the legislator of our civil law of 1984 wanted to recognize a full family status for unmarried couples and that this is absurd given that the granting of a patrimonial regime did not fall into a vacuum nor was it consecrated for an entelechy or an ethereal being: it was conceived for an unmarried couple that was (and is) openly a family, most of the times integrated by the concubines and by their descendants. It raises an interesting question that will be outlined in the present article, which is the following: how did this restriction of the normative regime affect de facto unions?

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Yuri Vega Mere, Universidad Católica Santa María (Arequipa)

Docente Honorario de la Universidad Católica Santa María (Arequipa). Socio Senior del estudio Muñiz. Maestría en la Universidad Particular de San Martín de Porres (2009-2010). ▪ Especialización en Disciplinas Bancarias de la Facultad de Economía en Universita degli Studi di Siena, Italia (1993). ▪ Abogado de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (1992). 

Published

2018-12-30

How to Cite

Vega Mere, Y. (2018). Food between cohabitants: from natural duty to constitutional duty. A different reading. Lumen, (14 - II), 240–254. https://doi.org/10.33539/lumen.2018.v14n2.1224