A comparative study of the philosophers of legal argumentation and soccer coaches

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33539/lumen.2022.v18n2.2673

Keywords:

legal argumentation, rules, principles, weighting, tactics

Abstract

In the conviction that the law is like life itself and that of all the unimportant things, soccer is the most important, this article tries to find similarities and differences between the thinking of the referents of legal argumentation and that of football coaches who have left their mark on the sport. In the case of law, positions that proclaim weighting are reviewed, as well as one that defends it as a hard core; As far as soccer is concerned, ideas will be analyzed that despite the time that has elapsed remain valid and exalt their creators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

José Julio Goicochea Elías, Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón Facultad de Derecho Lima, Perú

Doctor en Derecho por la Universidad Alas Peruanas. Maestro en Derecho Civil y Comercial por la Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal. Docente asociado en la Universidad Femenina del Sagrado Corazón. Orden al mérito Francisco de Paula Gonzales Vigil por el Ilustre Colegio de Abogados de Tacna. Miembro Honorario de los Colegios de Abogados de Tacna, Cusco, Selva Central, Moquegua y Apurímac. Conferencista nacional e internacional. Coautor en el Libro conmemorativo de las Jornadas Iberoamericanas en Derecho Procesal Penal 2022 organizadas por la Corte Superior de Justicia de Medellín.

Published

2022-12-05

How to Cite

Goicochea Elías, J. J. (2022). A comparative study of the philosophers of legal argumentation and soccer coaches. Lumen, 18(2), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.33539/lumen.2022.v18n2.2673

Most read articles by the same author(s)